Loyalty programmes have become a cornerstone of customer relationship management (CRM) strategies in today's digital landscape. Traditionally, these programmes have relied heavily on personal information, such as names, birth dates, and purchase histories, to create a sense of individual recognition and tailored service. However, in an era marked by heightened concerns over data privacy and stringent regulations like the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), a critical question arises: Is personal identification necessary for effective loyalty programmes?
The Loyalty Paradigm Shift: Behaviour Over Identification
Data analytics suggests that the efficacy of loyalty programmes is not contingent on personal identification. Instead, the focus should shift towards analysing and utilising anonymised behavioural data. This paradigm shift is predicated on understanding and targeting consumer behaviour and offers a more nuanced and potentially more effective approach to fostering customer loyalty.
The fundamental premise of this approach is that by analysing transactional patterns, browsing history, and even anonymised social media interactions, businesses can anticipate needs, tailor rewards, and incentivise engagement without infringing on personal privacy. This methodology aligns with the growing consumer demand for privacy, trust, and transparency in their interactions with brands and services.
The Advantages of Anonymised Behavioural Data
The use of anonymised behavioural data in loyalty programmes offers several advantages:
Enhanced Privacy Protection: By decoupling personal identifiers from behavioural data, businesses can significantly reduce the risk of privacy breaches and the associated reputational damage.
Broader Targeting Capabilities: Anonymised data allows for more inclusive and comprehensive targeting strategies, potentially reaching a wider audience than traditional, personally identifiable information (PII)-based approaches.
Compliance with Data Protection Regulations: This approach aligns more closely with the principles of data minimisation and purpose limitation outlined in modern data protection laws.
Improved Data Quality: When adequately analysed, behavioural data can provide more accurate insights into consumer preferences and habits than self-reported personal information.
Implications for Customer Relationship Management
The shift towards anonymised behavioural data in loyalty programmes has broader implications for CRM strategies. It challenges the long-held assumption that personalisation necessarily requires personal identification. Instead, it suggests that effective personalisation can be achieved by analysing behavioural patterns and preferences.
This approach aligns with the concept of 'contextual integrity' in privacy theory, as proposed by Helen Nissenbaum (2004). It suggests that the appropriateness of information flow is determined by context-relative informational norms rather than by the nature of the information itself.
Challenges and Future Directions
While anonymised behavioural data in loyalty programmes offers significant potential, it is not without challenges. These include:
Technical Complexities: Implementing systems that can effectively analyse and utilise anonymised behavioural data requires sophisticated technological infrastructure.
Regulatory Navigation: As data protection laws evolve, businesses must remain vigilant in ensuring their practices comply with current and emerging regulations.
Consumer Education: To allay potential concerns about data usage, consumers may need to be educated about the benefits and safeguards of this approach.
How is meed meeting these challenges?
Meed’s platform design is unique. Everything is on one platform and boiled down to its simplest explanation: membership links a customer ID to a business ID. However, because it is one platform, we can apply enterprise-level analytical analysis and AI features, which are then accessible to businesses paying a monthly subscription fee.
Most of the core team at meed had been working in Web3 before we started this business. Last year, the original version of meed was built as a blockchain solution. That is the story for another article. However, that experience taught us that consumers should retain sovereignty over their data. While developing meed, we understood that you needed access to data for personalisation to work. But it occurred to us that 1. A business does not require personal information for the one platform to function, and more importantly, 2. We can offer more personalisation based on a broader data set if we don’t merge behavioural data with personal data.Â
As a result, meed, through its platform AI agents, will create campaigns to put the right offer on the right phone of the right customer and provide all the metadata to the business of audience size and included data. But it won’t say to whom it is sending each offer. If the business can learn to accept that, they can target much more effectively using knowledge they previously could not act upon.Â
For example, the system might be able to say to the business:
You sell photo frames.
You have customers that buy photo frames, but they don’t buy them from you
Here is a group of X size, and you should send them this offer - press the big green button.Â
We cannot do this if we say who the target people are. However, we can if the business can overcome the compulsion to demand names.Â
This systemic pattern is one of a handful of ways meed is changing the rules. Most significant is that meed is a branded loyalty platform. Consumers will know they are using meed because they will see all their loyalty memberships in one wallet, even though each relationship is unique and built on a custom-collated set of tools. This is not a universal loyalty program with a common points scheme. We want consumers to know what meed is. We want them to walk past a window, see the meed logo, and understand what that means. It will be essential for us to educate the consumer that there is a solution to their frustration with fractionalised loyalty membership.Â
Conclusion
As we reimagine loyalty programmes for the digital age, the shift towards anonymised behavioural data presents a compelling alternative to traditional, identification-based approaches. This methodology offers the potential to balance the dual imperatives of personalisation and privacy protection effectively.
In an era where consumer trust is paramount, personalisation's greatest act may be respecting anonymity while still delivering value. As such, the future of loyalty programmes lies in the sophisticated use of anonymised behavioural data, marking a significant evolution in how businesses cultivate and maintain customer loyalty.
About meed
meed is the customer engagement platform that delivers the loyalty people want while providing enterprise-level performance for businesses. We redefine customer engagement, challenging traditional loyalty programs.
With meed, businesses can effortlessly drive growth and strengthen customer connections through app-free functionality, real-time engagement, and top-tier security. Our rapid deployment of cutting-edge tools ensures businesses stay ahead with future-proof technology. meed sets new customer retention and loyalty standards, delivering exactly what consumers desire.
Comments